— Sara Ahmed, “Strategic Inefficiency”
— Sara Ahmed, “Strategic Inefficiency”
Saint Rita of Cascia (Santa Rita de Cascia) by Pedro Antonio Fresquis, The Barnes Foundation
Barnes Foundation (Philadelphia), Collection Gallery, Room 11, North Wall
Medium: Water-based paint on wood panel
(via met-photos)
To close out the year, here are some of the things I most enjoyed in 2018! (Find previous years here.)
Books
Articles
Film & TV
Podcasts
Performances
Art
Things I made
Moments I had
I don’t want to criticize your parenting, but that sounds like a bad idea.
For those of you wondering about my URL: meet my inspiration.
I’ve started a side blog to chronicle my language learning adventures, if you’re interested! Right now I’m bumbling through the Polish course on Duolingo, but I also plan to use this space to maintain my Portuguese and Catalan. Follow @zle-dziecko on Tumblr and friend @caddington11 on Duolingo :)
Britta Marakatt-Labba
detail from History, a 24-meter (26-yard) tapestry at the University of Tromsø
photo by Ola Röe // see full tapestry here
— St. Ambrose, in the office of readings for today’s feast of St. Lucy
Self-Portrait as Saint Catherine of Alexandria, c. 1615–1617
Artemisia Gentileschi
National Gallery, London
Her eyes look away, as if thinking of a painful memory, yet there is a calm in her monumental pose. She’s got the strong, muscular arms Artemisia always gave the women in her paintings and as she ponders the past, the fingers of her left hand rest on a shattered wooden wheel with vicious metal spikes embedded in its rim.
Just a few years before she painted this self-portrait, those fingers were deliberately crushed in a courtroom in Rome, when an 18-year-old Gentileschi was publicly subjected to a thumbscrew-like torture called the sibille. Cords were twisted round her fingers then pulled tight, supposedly to ensure her evidence at the trial of the man who raped her was honest.
Santa Catalina
Fernando Yáñez de la Almedina, c. 1510
Museo del Prado
—
The learned men of Egypt
by a woman have been vanquished,
to demonstrate that sex
is not the essence of intelligence.
Victory! Victory!A wonder it was, a miracle—
the wonder being not the fact
that she has triumphed over them,
but that they would admit defeat.
Victory! Victory!How well we see that they were wise
in admitting they were beaten:
it is a triumph to concede
the supremacy of reason.
Victory! Victory!All the clarity of truth
cannot be shouted down,
for its echo, brave and long,
surmounts the noisy crowd.
Victory! Victory!The learned men think it no shame
that she has convinced them,
for they have learned, as learned men,
their learning has its limits.
Victory! Victory!She studies, and disputes, and teaches,
and thus she serves her Faith;
for how could God, who gave her reason,
want her ignorant?
Victory! Victory!
Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz
VI, Villancicos a Santa Catarina de Alejandría (Carols to Saint Catherine of Alexandria), 1691
Translated by Electa Arenal and Amanda Powell
Santa Isabel de Hungría (Saint Elizabeth of Hungary)
Venancio Vallmitjana Barbany, 1862
Museo del Prado
At the Hirshhorn that afternoon I touched my hands to glowing glass sensors that converted my pulse into ripples across a shallow pool. Soft blue lighting turned these streams into a play of light across the wall, interrupted or completed by the silhouettes of passing museumgoers. It’s impossible to know how much of the light show came from my own heart, and how much from the archive of patrons who had participated before me. But the surge in activity spoke for itself. It was a wonderful thing to stand inside my own heartbeat, to trap dozens of unwitting strangers in there with me, to watch my anxiety be made mesmerizing, to be not-alone with it.
Earlier that day I’d attended the much-heralded baptism of a much-loved little boy. There was a snake outside on the sidewalk. It was still there when we returned to the parking lot afterwards. We joked about it striking our heels, our crushing its head. But nothing happened, of course. It was at rest.
I have thought about that little snake for weeks now. I think of it every time I do my coding homework—we’re learning Python, because God likes to make me laugh. When our instructors introduced us to for loops, they said look, how convenient, computers will do all those boring tasks humans won’t. They’ll do the same task over and over again no matter how repetitive. Just make sure you don’t introduce any syntax errors that will interrupt the loop. Then the program won’t run. (When a program doesn’t run you get a blank screen, black terminal, pensive command line, awaiting your instruction, no results to share. It’s so peaceful to look at. I wish I could do that.)
I wish it were true that humans were so bored by repetition that we made computers to sub in for us. There is no limit to the nonsense over which my brain is willing to iterate, frittering my energy away over the minute absurdities that make up a given day. It is exhausting. I am so tired of un-learning this chatter. I wish I would run up against a syntax error that would shut my brain down until we can figure out what is going on.
The mass, that’s what I’m describing. Every day God throws me a syntax error in the form of the mass. It’s at precisely the same time every day, in the only window of time I always have free, in a chapel that’s on my way to everywhere. God interrupts the loop with a quick hello. I kneel, and it’s quiet, and it’s the only place where there is no alternate priority, nowhere for my automatic worrying to go. It is the one absolute space, the objectively better part. In lieu of the recessional we call upon St. Michael the Archangel.
And then we go out into a world full of snakes to crush, loops to break, such loud and full screens. He loves it though, all of it. He makes light shows out of anxious heartbeats and invites everyone else inside. None of this is for me alone.
You asked your disciples, who do you say that I am. And this is a good question, to which Peter gave the only good answer, you are the Christ, the son of the living God. You have been asking me the same question and I gave you a strange answer, or rather you gave me one.
I might as well say it here: you are kind in an age that is cruel, and you are punished for it, incessantly. I should be able to withstand Mass so much more easily if it were all symbolic. To think your body is broken while we all stare you down. Every time I look at you on the altar I remember what you told Beata Conchita about the pain you feel when a sacrilegious priest celebrates the Eucharist. When they consecrate they do not say ‘This is the body of Jesus,’ but rather ‘This is my body, my blood.’ How horrible, you confided in her, it is to be joined to a body that reviles yours. In persona Christi: to make your personhood vulnerable to abuse. You know what it is to have your person violated, to have someone force themselves upon you with so little care, such utter indifference, absent all tenderness or even fear. You are God, and you are man, and both are assaulted on the altar and out in the world, in your image and in your liturgical presence, every time some demonic arrogant soul proclaims that sort of possession. This is my body. Not yours.
These days, I say that you are among those hurt by all of this. We have always called you Victim and we are so slow to understand what that means, how that feels, what your justice will look like. I say you too.
Peter gave the better answer, I know. And you promised him in return that the powers of hell should not prevail against us—or rather, against you. It’s complicated: you said they shall not prevail against your church. Who is that? Who are you? For we use this term so carelessly, body of Christ, adding mystical like that will bandage our injuries to the Church and to each other and to you. Mystical, we emphasize, as if the spirit could not feel pain.
I return to your promise: The powers of hell shall not prevail against your body. The powers of hell shall not prevail against ours. You ordered your disciples that day not to tell anyone who you were. I’m sure you had your reasons then, but you said no such thing to me.
As part of the Praxis program’s unit on pedagogy, each member of the cohort has developed a low-tech workshop on a digital humanities topic. Mine focuses on print-to-digital transcription, and the materials are freely available here: lesson plan and slides.
At the link above, I share some reflections on how I came to this topic and what my goals for implementation are.
The Virgin and Child with the Infant Saint John the Baptist (details)
Bernard van Orley, c. 1515–1520
Museo del Prado